Artificial intelligence is changing how work gets done, more quickly than some organisations can change the capabilities that support it. While attention often focuses on tools and technology, many leaders report that the real constraint is how quickly people, roles, and skills can adapt as AI becomes embedded in everyday work.
AI has quickly evolved from pilots and proofs of concept to being embedded in core processes - from recruitment and learning to decision support and automation. In many organisations, adoption is happening unevenly and informally, driven by teams experimenting at their own speed. The result is a growing gap between what AI can enable and the change the organisation can absorb.
This gap matters, because AI is not just a technology shift - it is a change to ‘who’ and ‘how’ work gets done. For leaders, the question becomes understanding the value AI can bring, articulating a compelling vision that people can support, leading them at the right pace and upskilling them towards their evolving roles.
Without deliberate focus on people, the pace of change becomes a risk in itself.
RM Block
Learning new skills
With AI, every person is learning new skills at the same time.
Research and client experience consistently point to two distinct impacts of AI on work: automation and augmentation. Automation removes tasks. Augmentation changes how tasks are performed. Most roles will experience far more of the latter than the former.
In many cases, organisations lack a clear view of how this plays out across their workforce.
Leaders may ask where AI will “replace” roles. The better question is how roles will change - what tasks are automated, what judgement remains with people, and what new capabilities are required as a result. Without that clarity, how can you make confident decisions about where to invest, where to slow down, and where to move beyond ad‑hoc experimentation?
If you focus narrowly on immediate cost optimisation, you risk stripping out capabilities that may be critical in the future as AI continues to evolve and scale
With AI, every person is learning new skills at the same time. As people build confidence and better understand where AI can augment their work, they also begin to identify new tasks and activities that can be integrated into their roles — unlocking value that was previously inaccessible. In this sense, AI does not simply replace effort to reduce costs; it reshapes how value is created and how productivity is delivered across the organisation.
It is also important to keep perspective. Many leaders driving GenAI initiatives are only 18–24 months ahead of the wider workforce. While this can appear daunting, the gap is far smaller than it may seem. Organisations are actively building their AI capability bench through learning, experimentation and practical application, rather than relying on a small group of specialists.
Why pace matters
Pace matters, but is often misunderstood.
AI creates a tension between speed and sustainability. Leaders feel pressure to act quickly, driven by competitive, cost, and productivity concerns. But pace is not simply about how fast technology can be deployed. It is about how well the organisation can adapt alongside it.
As more AI projects are greenlit, technology collides with the lived reality of how people currently work. At the same time, foundational elements such as data quality, infrastructure and underlying dependencies often need to be revisited and strengthened, rather than taken as fit for purpose.
Many organisations want to move faster, but their foundations are simply not solid enough to build upon.
This has important implications for your organisation. If you focus narrowly on immediate cost optimisation, you risk stripping out capabilities that may be critical in the future as AI continues to evolve and scale. In contrast, framing AI around productivity and redeployment is more likely to preserve your capability while increasing your teams’ capacity.
In Europe and Ireland particularly, this distinction matters. Many organisations are less focused on immediate cost reduction and more concerned with competitiveness, resilience and future skills mapping. The challenge is turning that intent into practical decisions.
What you need to understand
Drawing on our experience supporting organisations through recent transformations, three key things emerge.
- Pace is an organisational capability, not a project timeline. AI adoption is constrained far less by technology than by data quality, role clarity, and workforce readiness. These foundations cannot be bypassed without creating friction and rework later.
- Most AI impact is evolutionary, not revolutionary. Roles rarely disappear overnight. They change incrementally. Leaders need visibility at task and capability level to manage that change deliberately.
- People and technology decisions are converging. As organisations consider whether work should be done by a person - an AI agent or a combination of both - traditional boundaries between HR and IT begin to blur. Decisions about roles, skills and systems increasingly sit together.
At its core, this is about organisational design and change, not just innovation.
What you can do now
The actions you need to take are practical, not theoretical. They are about realism, sequencing and clarity.
- Match ambition to organisational maturity. Many organisations aspire to advance AI solutions before foundational elements are in place (such as good data) and dependencies are understood. You need to be honest about the readiness of your business and recognise your critical role in setting realistic expectations.
- Understand your organisation’s natural speed limit. Effective AI adoption hinges on changing behaviours and mindsets across the workforce. Actively engage your people to understand sentiment and preconceptions around AI, including trust issues. From this, determine how far the organisation needs to go and the pace of change it can realistically absorb. Where competitors are moving faster, be deliberate about the change accelerators you can introduce.
- Anchor AI decisions in strategic workforce planning. Develop a clear view of current roles, skills, and task-level activities to understand where the impact of AI will be most felt, and how roles will evolve. Look ahead with strategic workforce planning to map future capability needs over the next three to five years, combining human and AI capabilities to allow you keep plans adaptable.
Anticipate how your workforce will inevitably evolve through natural attrition and mobility, and aim to identify gaps early. Above all, treat talent as a strategic asset— investing in continuous learning to build an adaptable culture that values growth alongside expertise.
These actions do not require perfect foresight. They require disciplined choices.
What good looks like in practice
Organisations getting this right tend to approach AI through the lens of strategic workforce planning and change. They use data and industry insight to understand how roles are shifting with AI. They invest in skills and capability where it matters most. And they engage and communicate clearly with people about how work will evolve and the central role that humans will need to play.
They also resist the temptation to over‑hype AI. Practical examples, credible timelines and realistic expectations build trust and momentum, allowing pace to become something that is actively managed, not reactively absorbed.
What to watch next
It’s likely that pressure on organisational pace will continue to intensify. Tools will improve, as expectations rise. Prepare to be asked, not just what AI you are using, but how your workforce is changing as a result.
Those who invest now in understanding roles, skills and capability and future workforce needs will have far more freedom to move quickly later. Those who do not may find that speed becomes their biggest constraint.
For more information visit kpmg.com
