Jailing of 45 Hong Kong pro-democracy activists in landmark trial draws criticism

Court dozens of democracy campaigners guilty of subversion, following a controversial national security trial

Hong Kong: Foreign diplomats await to enter court before hearing the sentence for 45 Hong Kong pro-democracy activists. Photograph: Leung Man Hei/EPA
Hong Kong: Foreign diplomats await to enter court before hearing the sentence for 45 Hong Kong pro-democracy activists. Photograph: Leung Man Hei/EPA

Hong Kong’s high court on Tuesday jailed 45 pro-democracy activists for up to 10 years following a landmark national security trial that has damaged the city’s once feisty democracy movement and drawn criticism from the US and other countries.

A total of 47 pro-democracy activists were arrested and charged in 2021 with conspiracy to commit subversion under a Beijing-imposed national security law which carried sentences of up to life in prison.

Benny Tai, a former legal scholar identified in the judgment as a “mastermind” of the activists’ plans, was sentenced to 10 years in jail, the longest sentence so far under the 2020 national security law.

The charges related to the organising of an unofficial “primary election” in 2020 to select the best candidates for an upcoming legislative election. The activists were accused by prosecutors of plotting to paralyse the government by engaging in potentially disruptive acts had they been elected.

READ SOME MORE

Some western governments have criticised the trial, with the US describing it as “politically motivated” and saying the democrats should be released as they had been legally and peacefully participating in political activities.

The Chinese and Hong Kong governments say the national security laws were necessary to restore order after mass pro-democracy protests in 2019, and the democrats have been treated in accordance with local laws.

After a 118-day trial, 14 of the democrats were found guilty in May, including Australian citizen Gordon Ng and activists Owen Chow and Gwyneth Ho, while two were acquitted.

The other 31 pleaded guilty and all 45 were given sentences ranging from 4-10 years. “Our true crime for Beijing is that we were not content with playing along in manipulated elections,” Ho, who was sentenced to seven years imprisonment, wrote in a Facebook post.

Hong Kong judgment articulates very expansive definition of seditionOpens in new window ]

“We dared to confront the regime with the question: will democracy ever be possible within such a structure? The answer was a complete crackdown on all fronts of society.”

Australia’s foreign minister Penny Wong said she was “gravely concerned” about the sentences, and called on China to “cease suppression of freedoms of expression, assembly, media and civil society,” in Hong Kong.

Mr Chow was sentenced to seven years and nine months in jail, while prominent activist Joshua Wong was sentenced to four years and eight months in jail, and Hendrick Lui was sentenced to more than four years in jail.

Afterwards, Mr Lui’s mother Elsa Wu shouted: “He’s a good person ... he’s not a political prisoner ... why does he have to go to jail?”

It was not immediately clear whether the defendants – some of whom have already been detained for more than 3 1/2 years – would have this time deducted from their sentences.

The judges Andrew Chan, Alex Lee and Johnny Chan wrote that in passing sentence they considered factors including the degree of planning, the number of people involved, the potential harms generated, in a “holistic assessment” irrespective of whether the scheme would have taken place or not.

Police officers walk outside the court before hearing the sentence for 45 Hong Kong pro-democracy activists. Photograph: Leung Man Hei/EPA
Police officers walk outside the court before hearing the sentence for 45 Hong Kong pro-democracy activists. Photograph: Leung Man Hei/EPA

“In order to succeed, the organisers and participants might have hurdles to overcome, that however was expected in every subversion case where efforts were made to overthrow or paralyse a government. We therefore rejected the proposition that the scheme was doomed to fail and that a lighter sentence should be imposed,” the judges wrote.

Hundreds of people had queued from the early hours outside the court, many holding umbrellas in light rain as they tried to secure a seat within the main courtroom and several spillover courts.

Authorities deployed a tight police presence outside the West Kowloon Magistrates' Court and for several blocks in the vicinity with police dogs, an armoured truck and vehicles with lights flashing. Some people were searched and questioned.

“I feel such an injustice needs witnessing,” said one woman who gave her name as Margaret and had been in the queue since Sunday afternoon. “They (the democrats) need to know they still have public support.”

The ruling, which critics have said tarnishes Hong Kong's role as a global financial hub, comes as the city is hosting an international financial summit to attract more business.

US president-elect Donald Trump’s nominee as secretary of state, Marco Rubio, has been a staunch critic of the trial and in an earlier open letter criticised the convictions as evidence of the national security law’s “comprehensive assault on Hong Kong’s autonomy, rule of law, and fundamental freedoms”.

Speaking outside the court building, Roxie Houge, the head of the US consulate in Hong Kong’s political section, said the US government condemned “the continuous prosecution of individuals here in Hong Kong who are expressing their political views ... exercising their freedom of speech”.

Taiwan’s presidential office condemned the jailings, saying democracy and freedom are universal values and Taiwan will continue to stand in solidarity with Hong Kong. -Reuters

(c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2024