Australian teenagers ask high court to block incoming social-media ban

Digital-freedom group takes legal action as world-first law set to take effect for children under 16

Australia is introducing a law banning individuals under the age of 16 from accessing social media platforms. Photograph: Asanka Ratnayake/Getty Images
Australia is introducing a law banning individuals under the age of 16 from accessing social media platforms. Photograph: Asanka Ratnayake/Getty Images

A constitutional challenge against Australia’s social media ban on children younger than 16 has been filed in the nation’s highest court, two weeks before the world-first law is set to take effect.

A campaign group called the Digital Freedom Project said on Wednesday it opened proceedings in the high court of Australia in a bid to block the law, with two 15-year-olds, Noah Jones and Macy Neyland, as plaintiffs in the case.

More than one million accounts held by teenagers under 16 are set to be deactivated in Australia when the ban on platforms including YouTube, TikTok, Snapchat and Meta’s Facebook and Instagram starts on December 10th.

In a statement on Wednesday, the Digital Freedom Project said the ban “robs” young Australians of their freedom of political communication, an implied right in the constitution. Australia does not have an express right to free speech.

“The legislation is grossly excessive,” the statement said.

Ms Neyland said the law would ban young people from expressing their views online.

“Young people like me are the voters of tomorrow ... we shouldn’t be silenced. It’s like Orwell’s book 1984, and that scares me,” she said.

The Digital Freedom Project’s president is John Ruddick, a member of the Libertarian Party in the New South Wales state parliament.

After news of the legal challenge broke, communications minister Anika Wells told parliament the centre-left government, led by prime minister Anthony Albanese, would not be intimidated by threats and legal challenges.

“Despite the fact that we are receiving threats and legal challenges by people with ulterior motives, the Albanese Labour government remains steadfastly on the side of parents, and not of platforms,” Ms Wells said.

Communications minister Anika Wells sad the government would not be intimidated by threats and legal challenges. Photograph: Hanna Lassen/Getty Images
Communications minister Anika Wells sad the government would not be intimidated by threats and legal challenges. Photograph: Hanna Lassen/Getty Images

Australian media has reported that YouTube also threatened to take a high court challenge on the grounds the ban burdened political communication.

Governments and tech firms around the world are closely watching Australia’s effort to implement the ban, one of the most comprehensive efforts to police minors’ social media access.

The ban was passed into law in November 2024 and is supported by the majority of Australians, according to opinion polling.

The government said research showed the over-use of social media was harming young teens, including causing misinformation, and enabling bullying and harmful depictions of body image.

Companies that fail to comply with the ban could face penalties of up to 49 million Australian dollars (€28 million). – Reuters

  • Understand world events with Denis Staunton's Global Briefing newsletter

  • Join The Irish Times on WhatsApp and stay up to date

  • Listen to In The News podcast daily for a deep dive on the stories that matter