The cardinals electing a new pope to lead the Catholic Church left the Sistine Chapel exhausted and hungry.
A meditation to start the conclave had dragged on and pushed their first vote deep into Wednesday evening. It had resulted in an inconclusive tally, with three main contenders. Keeping their vow of secrecy, they returned to Casa Santa Marta, the guest house where they were sequestered without their phones, and started talking.
Over dinner, as one gluten-free cardinal picked over vegetables and others shrugged at the simple fare, they weighed their choices. Cardinal Pietro Parolin (70), the Italian who ran the Vatican under Pope Francis, had entered the conclave as a front-runner but hadn’t received overwhelming support during the vote. The Italians were divided, and some of the cardinals in the room had become bothered by his failure to emphasise the collaborative meetings that Francis prioritised for governing the church.
Cardinal Peter Erdo of Hungary (72), backed by a coalition of conservatives that included some African supporters, had no way to build momentum in an electorate widely appointed by Francis.
That left Cardinal Robert Francis Prevost (69), a quiet American dark horse who had surprisingly emerged in the evening’s vote as a source of particular interest.
A missionary turned religious order leader, turned Peruvian bishop, turned Vatican power player, he checked many of the boxes that a broad range of cardinals hoped to fill. His seeming ability to be from two places at once – North and South America – pleased cardinals on two continents. As the prelates sounded out the Latin American cardinals who knew him well, they liked what they heard.
During the dinner, Prevost avoided any obvious politicking or machinations, cardinals said. By the next morning, he had transformed into an unsuspecting juggernaut who ultimately left little room for rival candidacies and ideological camps.
“You begin to see the direction and say, ‘Oh my goodness, I’m not going to use my five days’ worth of clothes,’” joked Cardinal Pablo Virgilio Siongco David of the Philippines. “It’s going to be resolved very fast.”
Interviews with more than a dozen cardinals, who could divulge only so much because of secrecy rules that carry the penalty of excommunication, and accounts from Vatican insiders told the story of how Prevost became Pope Leo XIV. The swift, stunning and taboo-smashing consensus around an American unfamiliar to many outside the church came on Thursday among an unwieldy College of Cardinals with many new members who didn’t know one another. They had different interests, languages and priorities, but a single choice.
[ The Irish Times view on Pope Leo: continuity and changeOpens in new window ]
Building Support
After the death of Francis on April 21st, cardinals from around the world began arriving in Rome. They joined powerful players in the Vatican who ran the church’s bureaucracy, including Prevost, whose career Francis had boosted.
Despite his intimate understanding of the Vatican, Prevost was still among the newbies, having been a cardinal not even for two years. And he had questions about the conclave.
He turned to one of the reported front-runners, Cardinal Luis Antonio Gokim Tagle of the Philippines, for help.
“‘How does this work?’” the American said, according to Tagle, who recounted the conversation. “I had experience in a conclave,” Tagle said, “and he didn’t.”
Unlike Tagle, he also didn’t have the name recognition considered necessary in an election among so many new cardinals who barely knew one another. Without a high profile or obvious base of support, the Chicago-born Villanova University graduate moved below the radar.
“I didn’t even know his name,” David of the Philippines said.
But Prevost was not a complete unknown. As the former leader of the Order of St Augustine, which operates around the world, and as the head of the Vatican office overseeing the world’s bishops, he had developed powerful connections and backers. First among them had been Francis, who put his career on the fast track. And his decades in Peru, fluent Spanish and leadership of the Pontifical Commission for Latin America gave him deep, and decisive, relationships on the continent.
“We almost all know him. He’s one of us,” said Cardinal Baltazar Enrique Porras Cardozo of Venezuela, who has known him for decades.
In the weeks before the conclave, the cardinals participated in a series of private meetings to discuss their concerns about the future of the church. Unlike Francis, who made his mark with a short speech sharing his vision for the church, several cardinals said that Prevost’s remarks did not stand out. “Like everyone else,” said Cardinal Juan José Omella Omella of Spain.
Cardinal Jean-Paul Vesco of France, the archbishop of Algiers, also could not recall what the American had said, but he got to talk to him on the sidelines of the meetings – which was important, he said, because he was increasingly being talked about as a candidate based on his “incredible” resume, fluent Italian, reputation as a moderate and connection to Francis. The cardinal started asking around to people who had worked with the American to vet him, and learned that he listened and worked well in groups. “I did my job,” Vesco said. “I have to vote. I have to know the person.”
Cardinal Wilton Gregory of the United States also said that Prevost had engaged “quite effectively” in the smaller group discussions with cardinals.
Those more intimate settings played to Prevost’s strengths, as he had gained a reputation around Rome as a studiously prepared, collegial and organised collaborator, especially as a top Vatican department head.
“I just admire the way he runs a meeting,” said Cardinal Blase J Cupich of Chicago, his hometown. “I mean, that’s hard to do, when you’ve got people of different language groups and cultures, and you’re trying to advise a pope on who should be a bishop, and you’re listening to all those people.”
On Saturday, May 3rd, five days before the conclave, the cardinals drew lots and assigned key roles. With 127 of the 133 who ultimately voted in attendance, Prevost was chosen to assist in running the daily meetings before they were sequestered and voting began.
As the different factions argued in those daily meetings about the future direction of the church, the cardinals from the Americas seemed to coalesce around him.
Cardinal Timothy M Dolan of New York, an outspoken and gregarious figure, said he tried to get to know his fellow American better at a breakfast.
Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Muller of Germany noted an electoral base that seemed to be forming, saying, “It’s a good number of cardinals from South America, North America.”
Porras of Venezuela said that cardinals from Latin America and the United States seemed on the same page about Prevost. “When you have friendship first,” he said, “everything is easier.”
The more the cardinals learned about Prevost, the more they liked, cardinals said. “Bob, this could be proposed to you,” Cardinal Joseph W Tobin of Newark, New Jersey, said he told Prevost soon before the conclave began.
Prevost had a lot of the experience they were looking for, said Cardinal Vincent Nichols of England. He had the heart of a missionary, scholarly depth and knowledge of the world. He had run a diocese as a bishop, which put him in close contact with parishioners, but had also worked in the Curia, the Roman bureaucracy that helps govern the church.
It did not escape the cardinals, Nichols said, that Parolin, the Vatican’s top diplomat, who was being pushed by his supporters in and out of the conclave, had deep experience only in the church bureaucracy.
“We’re not stupid,” he said.
[ 'Never again war': Pope Leo makes plea for peace in Ukraine and GazaOpens in new window ]
Quickly Shifting Fortunes
On Wednesday, after a long and solemn procession into the Sistine Chapel, the cardinals gathered at their assigned seats and took their vows. Just before 6pm the doors closed for the beginning of the conclave.
The meditation at the start, remarks on the gravity of the task at hand, ran about an hour, so long that Parolin, who was running the conclave, asked them if they wanted to call it a night and delay the first vote until the next morning.
“We didn’t have dinner, and there were no breaks – toilet breaks – either,” said David of the Philippines, but the group decided that it wanted a vote.
As voting got under way at about 7.30pm, the delay, with no explanation to the outside world, caused a stir among the waiting crowds. It seemed perhaps that the cardinals had already picked a pope who was getting dressed to come out on to the balcony.
Instead, the first vote that night amounted to what Omella of Spain called “a bit of a preliminary poll”.
“In the first vote, there were several candidates who won significant votes,” Cardinal Lazarus You Heung-sik of South Korea said, according to the South Korean news agency Yonhap. Vatican insiders said that those candidates included Parolin, Erdo and Prevost.
That’s when the cardinals returned to the guest house and started discussing the strengths and weaknesses of the men.
“Once we’re in Santa Marta, there was talk about individual candidates,” Nichols of England said. “That’s what we’re supposed to do.”
Muller of Germany, a prominent conservative critic of Francis whom the late pope had fired from his position as the church’s top doctrinal official, said he talked to the Latin Americans about Prevost and was told that he was “not divisive”.
The climate for Prevost seemed to be growing increasingly positive. The election was coming to him.
The next morning’s votes – the second and third of the conclave – made the picture clear.
“In the fourth vote, the ballots overwhelmingly shifted” to Prevost, You of South Korea said.
Muller sat behind the American front-runner in the Sistine Chapel and noticed that he seemed calm. Tagle, who sat next to Prevost, noticed him taking deep breaths as votes amassed in his favour.
“I asked him, ‘Do you want a candy?’ and he said ‘Yes,’” Tagle said.
During one of the votes, Tobin, as he held his ballot high and put it in the urn, turned and saw Prevost, whom he had known for about 30 years.
“I took a look at Bob,” Tobin of New Jersey said, “and he had his head in his hands.”
Later in the afternoon, they voted again, then counted the ballots one by one. When Prevost reached 89 votes, the two-thirds majority threshold needed to become pope, the room erupted in a standing ovation. “And he remained seated!” David said. “Somebody had to pull him up. We were all teary-eyed.”
As the counting continued and the votes for Prevost neared triple digits, Parolin had to ask them to sit down so they could finish.
“He obtained a very, very large majority of votes,” Cardinal Désiré Tsarahazana of Madagascar said.
After his election, cardinals enthusiastically congratulated the new pope. A short and uncontentious conclave was over and Leo XIV stepped through the crimson curtains on to the balcony of St. Peter’s Basilica and the world stage.
Tagle, the one-time favourite who days earlier had been asked by the American about the rules, told him: “‘If there’s anything you want to change about the conclave rules – it’s all in your hands now.’”
- This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
