Colombians have rejected a peace deal to end 52 years of war with Farc guerrillas, throwing the country into confusion about its future.
With counting completed from 98 per cent of polling stations, the no vote led with 50.23 per cent to 49.76 per cent, a difference of 61,000 votes.
The verdict on the deal between the government of Juan Manuel Santos and the Farc reached after four years of intense negotiations means it cannot now be implemented.
Polls before the vote predicted yes would win with a comfortable 66 per cent share. Mr Santos had been confident of a yes result and said during the campaign that he did not have a plan B and that Colombia would return to war if the no vote won.
His opponents, led by former president Alvaro Uribe, said a win for their side would be a mandate for the government and rebels to negotiate a "better agreement".
Both government and rebels have repeatedly said that the deal was the best they could achieve and a renegotiation would not be possible.
Mr Santos, who watched the results come in at the presidential palace in Bogota, said he would send his negotiators back to Havana to meet with Farc leaders on Monday.
“I will not give up,” he said in a televised address. I will continue seeking peace until the last day of my presidency.”
He added that the bilateral ceasefire that has been in place since August 29th would continue.
Mr Santos, who has staked his legacy on achieving peace, said he would meet with all political parties on Monday to find a way forward for the peace process. The vote would not affect Colombia’s stability, he said.
The Farc leader, Rodrigo Londono, said the insurgent group maintained its desire for peace despite the failure of a plebiscite to approve its recently signed deal with the government.
“The Farc reiterates its disposition to use only words as a weapon to build toward the future,” said Mr Londono, who is known by his nom de guerre, Timochenko. “To the Colombian people who dream of peace, count on us, peace will triumph.”
Fernando Giraldo, a political analyst, said the fact that both the government and guerrilla reiterated their commitment to peace was a good sign but the future was unclear. "The plebiscite laid everything out in black and white and now we're stuck in a grey area," he said.
Farc would have disarmed
Under the agreement rejected by voters, the Farc’s 5,800 fighters and a similar number of urban militia members would have disarmed and become a legal political party.
Whether or when that will happen now in unknown.
The deal would have allowed rebel leaders to avoid jail if they confessed to their crimes such as killing, kidnapping, indiscriminate attacks, and child recruitment, something that many Colombians found hard to swallow.
By promoting a no vote, Mr Uribe argued that he did not support continued war but wanted to fix the agreement. “Colombians let’s correct the path,” he said after the final results of the vote were announced. “We insist on correctives so that the constitution is respected, not substitutes, (that there be) justice, and not the derogation of institutions, political pluralism without it appearing to be a prize for criminals,” he said.
Both the Farc and government had believed that the deal that had been reached, which had overwhelming international support, had struck a balance between all those factors.
"Although imperfect, the agreement represented a concrete way forward for peace and justice," said Erika Guevara-Rosas, Americas Director at Amnesty International. "It's imperative that Colombia does not walk away from this project and that the country continues to move towards the long awaited peace millions are longing for."
In a ceremony on September 26th, with UN secretary general Ban Ki-moon, US Secretary of State John Kerry and a dozen Latin American leaders on hand as witnesses, Mr Santos and Mr Timochenko signed the deal their negotiators had reached after four years of talks in Havana.
In the days before the vote, Farc commanders rushed to make a round of public apologies to their victims in an attempt to boost support for the yes vote.
On Thursday, chief rebel negotiator Iván Márquez presented the community of Bojayá, Chocó, where the 2002 bombing of a church killed 119 people, with a new crucifix. At a similar event on Friday in Apartadó, Antioquia, the site of a 1994 Farc massacre of 35 people, Mr Márquez said it "never should have happened".
On Saturday UN monitors oversaw the Farc’s destruction of over 620kg of explosives in a remote corner of the country. The group also promised to give an accounting of their assets, to be used to compensate victims of the war, despite having previously said they had no money.
But the apologies and promises appear to have come too late to sway voters. "The day they are behind bars I will go and give them my hand and forgive them," said Nohora Tovar, a senator with Mr Uribe's Centro Democratico, who was kidnapped by the Farc in 2000.
The Guardian