Judge blocks suspension of Snap food aid during US government shutdown

Plaintiffs argue Trump administration’s decision to suspend benefits is unlawful as funds are available

A volunteer sorts donated food items at New York Common Pantry in New York, US, on Friday, as the US government shutdown stretches toward its second month. Photographer: Adam Gray/Bloomberg
A volunteer sorts donated food items at New York Common Pantry in New York, US, on Friday, as the US government shutdown stretches toward its second month. Photographer: Adam Gray/Bloomberg

A federal judge in Rhode Island on Friday blocked US president Donald Trump’s administration from suspending all food aid for millions of Americans amid the ongoing government shutdown and directed it to use contingency funds to pay for the benefits.

US district judge John McConnell in Providence issued a temporary restraining order at the behest of cities, nonprofits and a union that argued the US Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) suspension of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits, known as Snap or food stamps, starting Saturday, was unlawful.

He ruled from the bench minutes after another judge in Boston ruled that suspension was likely unlawful in a related case pursued by a coalition of Democratic-led states that also sought to avert the suspension.

“There is no doubt and it is beyond argument that irreparable harm will begin to occur if it hasn’t already occurred in the terror it has caused some people about the availability of funding for food, for their family,” Judge McConnell said during a virtual hearing.

The USDA has said insufficient funds exist to pay full benefits to 42 million low-income Americans, as they cost $8.5 billion to $9 billion per month. The Trump administration contends the agency lacks authority to pay them until Congress passes a spending bill ending a government shutdown that began October 1.

The plaintiffs, represented by the liberal legal advocacy group Democracy Forward, argued the agency’s decision to suspend benefits was wrong and unlawful, as the USDA still had funds available to fulfil its obligation to pay Snap benefits.

Such available funding includes $5.25 billion in contingency funds that Congress has previously provided the USDA for use when “necessary to carry out program operations”, the plaintiffs said.

Aside from the contingency funds, the plaintiffs argued that a separate fund of around $23 billion could also be used to avoid what would be an unprecedented suspension of Snap benefits. – Reuters

  • Join The Irish Times on WhatsApp and stay up to date

  • Sign up for push alerts to get the best breaking news, analysis and comment delivered directly to your phone

  • Listen to In The News podcast daily for a deep dive on the stories that matter