Tech giant Apple alleges the Data Protection Commissioner (DPC) acted unlawfully and unreasonably by refusing to determine the validity of a complainant before proceeding to give a draft decision on the data processing claim.
Apple Distribution International Limited on Monday secured High Court approval to proceed with its judicial review challenge to a decision the DPC made last September.
Apple is asking the court to overturn the decision, which involves the DPC’s refusal to determine the validity or admissibility of a sample complainant before proceeding to a preliminary draft decision for submission to other authorities.
The company wants the High Court to declare that the DPC acted unlawfully, unreasonably and outside of its powers in refusing to determine the validity of the complaint.
Donald Trump is changing America in ways that will reverberate long after he is dead
The jawdropper; the quickest split; the good turn: Miriam Lord’s 2024 Political Awards
The mystery is not why we Irish have responded to Israel’s barbarism. It’s why others have not
Enoch Burke released from prison as judge doubles fine for showing up at school
Apple claims that the DPC had also breached the company’s right to fair procedure and had acted contrary to the requirements of natural and constitutional justice.
Imogen McGrath SC, for Apple, on Monday secured a court-imposed pause to further steps being taken in the inquiry, which arises from a complaint launched by French digital rights and freedoms advocacy group La Quadrature du Net (LQdN). The application was made while only her client was represented in court.
Apple claims the DPC “does not have jurisdiction to produce a draft decision […] unless that complaint is determined to be valid or admissible”.
The company says that LQdN “lodged a complaint purportedly on behalf of 6,880 people” with the French data watchdog, Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et de Libertés (CNIL), alleging that Apple is processing personal data in a way that infringes the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The CNIL is the body responsible for monitoring the application of data protection in France.
Apple denies the allegation.
Apple says that the complaint was lodged in May 2018, “three days” after the GDPR came into force across Europe. LQdN says that it was mandated, prior to the GDPR coming into effect, to lodge the complaint when certain persons ticked an online form or petition to mandate the making of complaints against a number of companies, including Apple.
On March 3rd, 2021, an individual nominated by LQdN as a “sample subject” was required to confirm whether or not they were a registered user of an iOS device at the time of the complaint and an email address was provided. However, on March 18th, 2021, Apple said it had no record of any account on its books matching the email address provided.
In September 2021, Apple submitted that it was concerned that the investigation “may have proceeded on a fundamentally flawed basis” because it could not be confirmed that the sample subject was a relevant, or valid, data subject.
In February 2022, the DPC’s office wrote to Apple saying the file had been passed on to the commissioner and that the first sample subject had now been substituted with an alternative individual.
Apple says the DPC should not have proceeded to any decision-making stage without first making a decision on the validity of the grounds and that this was of “fundamental importance” to the conduct of the inquiry.
The company also submits that last September the DPC failed to articulate reasons for “the refusal of the request for a standalone decision on validity” before continuing with the inquiry into the complaint that will lead to a draft decision.
Ms Justice Gearty granted leave to appeal to Ms McGrath and put a stay on the inquiry before adjourning the matter to January and reserved the costs of the hearing.
- Sign up for push alerts and have the best news, analysis and comment delivered directly to your phone
- Join The Irish Times on WhatsApp and stay up to date
- Listen to our Inside Politics podcast for the best political chat and analysis
