UK court to consider PSNI independence in carrying out ‘hooded men’ investigation

Judges to consider if legacy investigations branch of PSNI is ‘sufficiently independent’

An image from March 2018 showing seven of the ‘hooded men’, who were kept in hoods while interned in Northern Ireland in 1971. From left, Jim Auld, Patrick McNally, Liam Shannon, Francie McGuigan, Davy Rodgers, Brian Turley and Joe Clarke. Photograph: PA
An image from March 2018 showing seven of the ‘hooded men’, who were kept in hoods while interned in Northern Ireland in 1971. From left, Jim Auld, Patrick McNally, Liam Shannon, Francie McGuigan, Davy Rodgers, Brian Turley and Joe Clarke. Photograph: PA

The UK supreme court is considering whether the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) is sufficiently independent to carry out investigations into events during the Troubles half a century ago.

Seven judges based in London are hearing arguments relating to proposed police investigations into the killing of a Catholic woman in 1972 and the treatment of 12 people, who have become known as the “hooded men”, detained in 1971, at a remote hearing due to end on Wednesday.

Lord Hodge, Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Kitchin, Lord Sales, Lord Hamblen, Lord Leggatt and Lord Burrows have been asked to consider issues relating to the shooting of 24-year-old Jean Smyth in Belfast and the detention of the “hooded men”, following rulings by judges in Northern Ireland.

A barrister representing Mrs Smyth’s sister, Margaret McQuillan, and Francis McGuigan, one of the “hooded men”, told judges that the cases were of the “utmost seriousness”.

READ SOME MORE

Hugh Southey QC said, in a written case outline, that one case concerned the fatal shooting of an “unarmed young mother” in circumstances “implicating British Army personnel”.

He said the other concerned “state-sanctioned torture and/or inhuman and degrading treatment”.

Mr Southey said two issues arose in both cases, the “applicability of investigatory obligation” imposed by articles of the European Convention on Human Rights and the independence of the PSNI.

He argued that Mrs Smyth’s sister and Mr McGuigan were entitled to “effective, independent investigation” and told judges the PSNI lacked the “requisite independence to investigate”.

Call for independent investigations

Amnesty International, which has supported a campaign by the “hooded men”, wants independent investigations.

Lawyers representing the PSNI asked the Supreme Court to consider the case, following court hearings in Northern Ireland.

Judges are also hearing arguments from lawyers representing Northern Ireland secretary Brandon Lewis.

A supreme court spokeswoman said, in a written explanatory note, judges would consider whether the legacy investigations branch of the PSNI was “sufficiently independent” to investigate Mrs Smyth’s death, or other “such deaths”.

The spokeswoman said an investigation was planned by the police service’s legacy investigations branch but, before it began, Mrs Smyth’s sister had taken legal action and raised issues relating to independence.

She said judges would also consider whether the PSNI was “sufficiently independent” to carry out “any necessary investigation” into the treatment of the “hooded men”. – PA