Elon Musk and Tesla are set to go to trial in San Francisco on Tuesday in a case where the company’s shareholders claim they were defrauded by Musk’s 2018 statement that funding was “secured” to take the electric carmaker private.
The lawsuit seeks damages for shareholders who bought or sold Tesla stock in the days after Mr Musk’s tweets on August 7th, 2018. The company’s shares shot higher and then fell again after August 17th, 2018, when the New York Times reported that funding for the take-private bid was “far from secure”.
The shareholders have not specified the damages, but said Mr Musk’s tweets cost investors “billions”.
The defendants, who include seven current and former Tesla directors, have denied wrongdoing.
Bluesky may be in danger of becoming Elon Musk’s black mirror
The Irish Times view on social media regulation: Ireland caught in the middle
Irish Quakers join ‘Twitter eXodus’, abandoning social network over misinformation and harmful content
Elon Musk’s X accuses Ireland’s media watchdog of ‘regulatory overreach’
Opening arguments could get under way later on Tuesday, after the jury is selected. Potential panellists were asked ahead of time about their opinions of Mr Musk and whether they own a Tesla vehicle.
[ Looming Twitter interest payment leaves Elon Musk with unpalatable optionsOpens in new window ]
[ Tesla slashes prices by as much as a fifth in bid to boost its electric car salesOpens in new window ]
Mr Musk had asked US district court judge Edward Chen to move the case to Texas, arguing too many potential jurors are biased against him because of negative local media coverage of lay-offs at Twitter, which he took over in October. The judge, who is overseeing the case, denied that bid last week.
Investors sued in August 2018, shortly after Mr Musk posted on Twitter that he was considering taking Tesla private at $420 per share. “Funding secured,” he said.
In another tweet the same day, he wrote, “Investor support is confirmed,” adding, “Only reason why this is not certain is that it’s contingent on a shareholder vote.”
What will a new insurer in the market mean for consumers?
Judge Chen has ruled that those statements were untrue and reckless. The jury will decide whether Mr Musk’s words mattered to investors, whether he acted knowingly and whether to award damages and in what amount.
The defendants have said in court papers that they will argue that Mr Musk had good reason to believe funding for the deal was secured.
The billionaire had on multiple occasions met Yasir Al-Rumayyan, managing director of Saudi Arabia’s sovereign wealth fund, according to the court filing, which also said Mr Al-Rumayyan had urged Mr Musk to take Tesla private and offered up to $60 billion in backing.
Mr Musk may take the stand in the case, according to court documents, along with Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison and James Murdoch, son of Fox Corp chairman Rupert Murdoch. The trial is expected to last about three weeks. – Reuters
